<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plenty of Fish Dating Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html</link>
	<description>If there are plenty of fish in the sea, why isn&#039;t anyone biting?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-19470</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themodernsavage.com/onlinedatingparadox/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-19470</guid>
		<description>Oh and I definitely made first contact with a number of men. The &quot;add to your favourites&quot; option worked for me when I felt shy...he saw that Ibadded h and followed up :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I definitely made first contact with a number of men. The &#8220;add to your favourites&#8221; option worked for me when I felt shy&#8230;he saw that Ibadded h and followed up <img src='http://onlinedatingparadox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-19468</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themodernsavage.com/onlinedatingparadox/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-19468</guid>
		<description>I am female and PoF was great for me. In 2 months I sorted through 60 guys with whom I had had some sort of interaction (ie ommitting the ones not at all interested in), narrowed it down to 8 first dates, number 7 w&#039;as the keeper. 1year, 7months later we are making marriage plans
We&#039;d have never met without PoF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am female and PoF was great for me. In 2 months I sorted through 60 guys with whom I had had some sort of interaction (ie ommitting the ones not at all interested in), narrowed it down to 8 first dates, number 7 w&#8217;as the keeper. 1year, 7months later we are making marriage plans<br />
We&#8217;d have never met without PoF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig G</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-6029</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themodernsavage.com/onlinedatingparadox/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-6029</guid>
		<description>Ever Since marcus got married... pof has changed, evow was made.. and pof seems to be female favored. 

Females have an option to see whos most likely interested.. well what good is that to the average female who WONT message a guy first. Give that option to the men ffs!! so we can stop wasting money on female scam artists, and women who are currently with a guy ( alot are ) and just out entertaining her ego without ever wanting anything else. 49% fine their boyfriend on pof.. get it?? cause 51% of the others are already in a relationship, or married. Sure sure.. as the saying goes women dont cheat.. ONLINE WOMEN.. do.  Anyhow give this otpion to the guys.. so we know WHOS going to reply instead of being replied to like garbage from some engaged loser whos just on it for fun with friends.

thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever Since marcus got married&#8230; pof has changed, evow was made.. and pof seems to be female favored. </p>
<p>Females have an option to see whos most likely interested.. well what good is that to the average female who WONT message a guy first. Give that option to the men ffs!! so we can stop wasting money on female scam artists, and women who are currently with a guy ( alot are ) and just out entertaining her ego without ever wanting anything else. 49% fine their boyfriend on pof.. get it?? cause 51% of the others are already in a relationship, or married. Sure sure.. as the saying goes women dont cheat.. ONLINE WOMEN.. do.  Anyhow give this otpion to the guys.. so we know WHOS going to reply instead of being replied to like garbage from some engaged loser whos just on it for fun with friends.</p>
<p>thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themodernsavage.com/onlinedatingparadox/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-215</guid>
		<description>I have used POF for a couple of years and keep a hidden profile there to use if I find someone interesting while browsing once or twice a month.  The reason I keep my profile hidden is because, if I do not, I am bombarded with emails from every walk of life.  Most of these men should have sense enough NOT to bother with me, based upon what I am looking for as outlined clearly within my profile.  I am a Christian woman seeking a Christian man...difficult on POF.  I have non-Christian male friends who use the site for &quot;flings&quot;, one-night-stands...sex, in general.  They have very impressive profiles that would lead a woman to think otherwise.  So, I&#039;m very leary of most of the men on this site.  I certainly do not mean to generalize.  But, when you have the &quot;inside scoop&quot; as I do from male friends, you cannot be foolish enough to overlook that valuable info.  :o)  The paid upgrade is a really good idea to set apart the serious ones from the guys I have just described.  I know for a fact that my player friends WILL NOT pay for an upgrade and are perfectly happy with all of the women they meet for free.  The upgrade was a great idea that I hope will take off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used POF for a couple of years and keep a hidden profile there to use if I find someone interesting while browsing once or twice a month.  The reason I keep my profile hidden is because, if I do not, I am bombarded with emails from every walk of life.  Most of these men should have sense enough NOT to bother with me, based upon what I am looking for as outlined clearly within my profile.  I am a Christian woman seeking a Christian man&#8230;difficult on POF.  I have non-Christian male friends who use the site for &quot;flings&quot;, one-night-stands&#8230;sex, in general.  They have very impressive profiles that would lead a woman to think otherwise.  So, I&#39;m very leary of most of the men on this site.  I certainly do not mean to generalize.  But, when you have the &quot;inside scoop&quot; as I do from male friends, you cannot be foolish enough to overlook that valuable info.  <img src='http://onlinedatingparadox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )  The paid upgrade is a really good idea to set apart the serious ones from the guys I have just described.  I know for a fact that my player friends WILL NOT pay for an upgrade and are perfectly happy with all of the women they meet for free.  The upgrade was a great idea that I hope will take off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themodernsavage.com/onlinedatingparadox/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-137</guid>
		<description>&quot;Where are you getting the 10-18% from?&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s just ratios. Divide 49% by 3 and 5. Assuming women are only getting one BF each. Not always the case :-) I guess that&#039;s what s/he meant.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;But here&#039;s the thing - despite a high male:female ratio, it&#039;s not difficult to get dates from IF you have the ability and willingness to stand out from the rest of the men on the site. Who by the way, are mostly pathetic in their attempts to get dates of of POF.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I do OK, but I disagree with the quote above, in general. I bring a lot to the table, but I see a lot of decent guys getting nowhere there ... mostly based on looks/height/money. But yeah. a quite a few guys have a bad approach. I tried to help out a few buddies with profiles/email. It was pretty hard to get past average looks/height.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is you&#039;re blog, so I&#039;m not about to rip apart the value/use of free dating sites. It is what it is. Like it, don&#039;t like it, doesn&#039;t matter. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But i will say this. If you&#039;re a women on a free dating site waiting for the proverbial good guy with edge to line up in your email queue, then it ain&#039;t going to happen. Ya gotta go get him. That&#039;s what these guys are used to, that&#039;s what they stick with. If they can&#039;t translate that in the profiles, tough luck for them.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The 49% probably comes from database records in the delete account function which requests reason for leaving, one of which is found somebody. That doesn&#039;t mean found a boyfriend, just means met somebody, deleting account to see how it goes. Quite a few I would imagine lasts the typically 3 month honeymoon period, same as real life. So looking at it this way, 49% isn&#039;t impressive, it just misinformation sales tactics. One would hope given the male:female ratio that at least 70% of woman at least get a 3 month boyfriend.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t have anything against POF. It&#039;s just a potential dating site. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The ratio of single men without kids to single women without kids on POF is probably closer to 8-10:1. Endpoints super good looking and below average have different ratios I&#039;d imagine. But average and slightly above is pretty competitive. I think this is why the first poster questioned the level of effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Where are you getting the 10-18% from?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just ratios. Divide 49% by 3 and 5. Assuming women are only getting one BF each. Not always the case <img src='http://onlinedatingparadox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I guess that&#8217;s what s/he meant.</p>
<p>&#8220;But here&#8217;s the thing &#8211; despite a high male:female ratio, it&#8217;s not difficult to get dates from IF you have the ability and willingness to stand out from the rest of the men on the site. Who by the way, are mostly pathetic in their attempts to get dates of of POF.&#8221;</p>
<p>I do OK, but I disagree with the quote above, in general. I bring a lot to the table, but I see a lot of decent guys getting nowhere there &#8230; mostly based on looks/height/money. But yeah. a quite a few guys have a bad approach. I tried to help out a few buddies with profiles/email. It was pretty hard to get past average looks/height.</p>
<p>This is you&#8217;re blog, so I&#8217;m not about to rip apart the value/use of free dating sites. It is what it is. Like it, don&#8217;t like it, doesn&#8217;t matter. </p>
<p>But i will say this. If you&#8217;re a women on a free dating site waiting for the proverbial good guy with edge to line up in your email queue, then it ain&#8217;t going to happen. Ya gotta go get him. That&#8217;s what these guys are used to, that&#8217;s what they stick with. If they can&#8217;t translate that in the profiles, tough luck for them.</p>
<p>The 49% probably comes from database records in the delete account function which requests reason for leaving, one of which is found somebody. That doesn&#8217;t mean found a boyfriend, just means met somebody, deleting account to see how it goes. Quite a few I would imagine lasts the typically 3 month honeymoon period, same as real life. So looking at it this way, 49% isn&#8217;t impressive, it just misinformation sales tactics. One would hope given the male:female ratio that at least 70% of woman at least get a 3 month boyfriend.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have anything against POF. It&#8217;s just a potential dating site. </p>
<p>The ratio of single men without kids to single women without kids on POF is probably closer to 8-10:1. Endpoints super good looking and below average have different ratios I&#8217;d imagine. But average and slightly above is pretty competitive. I think this is why the first poster questioned the level of effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Savage</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themodernsavage.com/onlinedatingparadox/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-134</guid>
		<description>There are certainly a lot more men on the site than women and wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the ratio is more like 10:1.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Where are you getting the 10-18% from? Is this just a guess or do you have some data that would suggest this, which I&#039;d be curious to see.  Though I would agree that the percentage is likely pretty low.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But here&#039;s the thing - despite a high male:female ratio, it&#039;s not difficult to get dates from IF you have the ability and willingness to stand out from the rest of the men on the site.  Who by the way, are mostly pathetic in their attempts to get dates of of POF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are certainly a lot more men on the site than women and wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the ratio is more like 10:1.</p>
<p>Where are you getting the 10-18% from? Is this just a guess or do you have some data that would suggest this, which I&#8217;d be curious to see.  Though I would agree that the percentage is likely pretty low.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing &#8211; despite a high male:female ratio, it&#8217;s not difficult to get dates from IF you have the ability and willingness to stand out from the rest of the men on the site.  Who by the way, are mostly pathetic in their attempts to get dates of of POF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themodernsavage.com/onlinedatingparadox/2008/07/plenty-of-fish-dating-statistics.html#comment-132</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, for some reason this number is not shown, but I&#039;m guessing it&#039;s much lower.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yeah, I don&#039;t know how they getthat number either. It&#039;s certainly not reliable. However ...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The ratio of men:women on POF varies from 3-5:1. Guessing is not required. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The percentage of men finding a &quot;gf&quot; on the site is between 10-18%.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Think about it. How much effort will men put into odds that low?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, for some reason this number is not shown, but I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s much lower.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t know how they getthat number either. It&#8217;s certainly not reliable. However &#8230;</p>
<p>The ratio of men:women on POF varies from 3-5:1. Guessing is not required. </p>
<p>The percentage of men finding a &#8220;gf&#8221; on the site is between 10-18%.</p>
<p>Think about it. How much effort will men put into odds that low?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

