<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Picture Rating Sites for Profile Attraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2010/02/using-picture-rating-sites-for-profile-attraction.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2010/02/using-picture-rating-sites-for-profile-attraction.html</link>
	<description>If there are plenty of fish in the sea, why isn&#039;t anyone biting?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torsh Johnansen</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2010/02/using-picture-rating-sites-for-profile-attraction.html#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Torsh Johnansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingparadox.com/?p=428#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s too much to bash Hot or Not as being &quot;objectifying&quot;.

1.  It&#039;s rating people&#039;s pictures.  A picture is an object.  Yes, it represents you, but they&#039;re still rating the picture.

2. The option to &#039;online date&#039; thru it -- guess what?  Looks matter in one&#039;s choices.  Bigtime.  It&#039;s what people see.  They see a thumbnail looking at profiles, and they click on it.  Why?  Looks.  Everything&#039;s &#039;objectified&#039; when it comes to taste issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s too much to bash Hot or Not as being &#8220;objectifying&#8221;.</p>
<p>1.  It&#8217;s rating people&#8217;s pictures.  A picture is an object.  Yes, it represents you, but they&#8217;re still rating the picture.</p>
<p>2. The option to &#8216;online date&#8217; thru it &#8212; guess what?  Looks matter in one&#8217;s choices.  Bigtime.  It&#8217;s what people see.  They see a thumbnail looking at profiles, and they click on it.  Why?  Looks.  Everything&#8217;s &#8216;objectified&#8217; when it comes to taste issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Black</title>
		<link>http://onlinedatingparadox.com/2010/02/using-picture-rating-sites-for-profile-attraction.html#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>David Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingparadox.com/?p=428#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Good stuff here. I love to use &#039;pre-tested&#039; content on my online profiles. Pictures that have got good ratings elsewhere on ratings sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff here. I love to use &#8216;pre-tested&#8217; content on my online profiles. Pictures that have got good ratings elsewhere on ratings sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
